As can be gathered from the media, you have once again “put
the kibosh” on the amalgamation of your various cultural foundations.
The word “culture” is, of course, a very old German word,
and is surely more likely connected to “ancient cult”
as you, with your tenacious political efforts in the fields of “veto”
and “money”, are able to imagine.
Furthermore, we must also be aware that all kinds of interpretations
of the term “art” – especially also the left-wing
German Lutheran ones – have nothing to do with “culture”
in the aforementioned sense of “ancient cult”.
If our ancestors had wanted to use the term “culture”
when talking about “art”, then they would surely have
done so – even heathens, who apparently lived like monkeys in
trees would not have been so stupid as to not be able to distinguish
between two such different sounding words, even if today we experience
this in great numbers particularly among the cultural and art experts
in our so-called civilised world, - who indeed stray even further
afield in their artificial imagination.
“Culture” in the aforementioned original sense of “ancient
cult” is not a “project, which has to be promoted with
the help of money”, either, but culture is a very ancient universal
inner-human concern to smooth the way for a society to the laws and
secrets of nature and divine revelation.
And the manipulating inclusion of an institution, which has arbitrarily
appropriated the name and not the mind of one of our great poets and
thinkers (Goethe), does not lead to what the name “culture”
originally meant, demanded and promised.
The equivalent applies to your “cultural majesties”. Every
ancient cult and therefore every culture in its essence strives for
the submission of mankind to the sovereignty of nature and the Creator
respectively with cultural actions.
However, this can absolutely not be the position of the Federal Republic
of Germany, being at present one of the left-wing Protestant atheist
German Lutheran Church States – nor that of the individual federal
states as superficial political institutions beyond all culture.
Neither does tiring blind actionism with that undynamic term “consultation
forum” help – for in the field of culture in the sense
of ancient cult, there can only be questions at issue if this field
is monopolised by ignorance – also political.
In this respect, the term “cultural politics” is a mistake
to begin with; because politics only develops historically, just like
everywhere else, where culture has failed. It would be downright foolish
if the son who had turned out badly were appointed to bring up his
old and frail father. The result would inevitably be political corruption
in the field of culture – and this we already have – in
content as well as consequences:
corruption among politicians, social problems upon problems and a
society of “free” citizens, grunting and groaning under
this state of affairs.
Where “culture” in the original sense is concerned, money
can be of as little importance as in worship.
And as little as a “systemisation of worship promotion”
would make political sense, there is equally little sense in a systemisation
of cultural promotion in Germany.
Neither can the recognition of cultural activities in the original
meaning of the word “culture” be undertaken by a political
group gripped by corruption, but will sooner be derived from the fact
that these extremely degrading things disappear from our society.
“But who is talking about culture?” the FAZ asks at the
end of their publication.
Nature talks about culture in the original sense of the word –
and the result is Creation. The scientific studies of the harmony
laws of nature lead directly into the centre of what our ancestors
used to describe as culture, and pursued successfully as culture or
more precisely: as ancient cult.
If you would like to be informed and advised about the essence of
culture in favour of cultural achievement development, then –
provided there is serious interest – I would be pleased to be
at your disposal to give some advice and support regarding the sense
of the original meaning of this noble – perhaps noblest of terms
in our society in favour of an improvement to the quality of life
in our society. You can contact me unconventionally in this matter
by e-mail.
With kind and well-meaning regards
